Nicholas Allott

468 citations
23 papers · 199 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Allott

18 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers

Nicholas Allott
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Language and Linguistics 108
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 115
  • Philosophy 42
  • Cultural Studies 16
  • Literature and Literary Theory 18
Replace Adrian Pilkington with:
Adrian Pilkington United Kingdom
Pierre Encrevé France
Carlo Penco Italy
Henrik Liljegren Sweden
Laurence Horn United States
Anne Dister Belgium
Willem J. de Reuse United States
Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi Italy
Guillermo Del Pinal United States
Hein van der Voort Brazil
Nicholas Allott relative to Adrian Pilkington United Kingdom Adrian Pilkington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Adrian Pilkington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Allott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Allott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Allott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Allott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Allott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Allott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Allott. The network helps show where Nicholas Allott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Allott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Allott Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Allott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201334
2 200634
3 201527
4 201223
5 201722
6
Key Terms in Pragmatics
201011
7 200511
8 20228
9 20196
10 20245
11 20173
12 20233
13 20163
14 20173
15 20192
16 20171
17 20251
18 20191
19 20171
20
Legal speech and the elements of adjudication
20170

About Nicholas Allott

Nicholas Allott is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Strategy and Management and Cultural Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (6 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (6 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (2 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers), Quality and Management Systems (2 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (108 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations), Philosophy (42 citations), Cultural Studies (16 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (18 citations). Nicholas Allott has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Textor, Neil Skene Smith, Andrew Martin, Georges Rey, Noam Chomsky, Neil T. Smith and Chris Knight. Their work appears in journals such as Inquiry, Language and Cognition, The Linguistic Review, dialectica and The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact