Niaz Chalabianloo

968 citations
16 papers · 655 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Niaz Chalabianloo

12 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers

Niaz Chalabianloo
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 230
  • Applied Psychology 68
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 195
  • Human-Computer Interaction 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 130
Replace Deniz Ekiz with:
Deniz Ekiz Türkiye
Claus Marberger Germany
Cornelia Setz Switzerland
Syed Monowar Hossain United States
Karen Hovsepian United States
Sougata Sen United States
Saskia Koldijk Netherlands
Davide Morelli United Kingdom
Jacqueline Wijsman Netherlands
Niaz Chalabianloo relative to Deniz Ekiz Türkiye Deniz Ekiz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Deniz Ekiz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Niaz Chalabianloo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Niaz Chalabianloo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Niaz Chalabianloo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Niaz Chalabianloo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Niaz Chalabianloo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Niaz Chalabianloo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Niaz Chalabianloo. The network helps show where Niaz Chalabianloo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Niaz Chalabianloo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Niaz Chalabianloo Line = papers co-authored together Niaz Chalabianloo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2019226
2 202077
3 202173
4 201772
5 202047
6 202044
7 202036
8 202128
9 202225
10 202019
11 20254
12 20203
13 20181
14 20250
15 20250
16 20250

About Niaz Chalabianloo

Niaz Chalabianloo is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Biomedical Engineering, Toxicology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (8 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (3 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper) and IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (230 citations), Applied Psychology (68 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (195 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (45 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (130 citations). Niaz Chalabianloo has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cem Ersoy, Yekta Said Can, Deniz Ekiz, Corina Sas, Muhammad Umair, Gürkan Gür, Javier Fernández‐Álvarez, Giuseppe Riva, Claudia Repetto and Heather Iles‐Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors, IEEE Access, Pervasive and Mobile Computing, Expert Opinion on Drug Safety and Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact