Neena John
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Papers in
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 4
-
- Connexins and lens biology 2
- Co-authors
- Sanjeev Gupta (7 shared papers)Astrid Fletcher (7 shared papers)Praveen Vashist (2 shared papers)Usha Chakravarthy (7 shared papers)GVS Murthy (3 shared papers)G. V. S. Murthy (6 shared papers)Praveen Vashist (5 shared papers)Giovanni Maraini (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (4 papers)Ophthalmology (2 papers)Ophthalmic Epidemiology (2 papers)BMC Women s Health (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Neena John
20 papers receiving 828 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Ophthalmology 257
- Epidemiology 188
- Biochemistry 34
- Drug Discovery 1
- Clinical Biochemistry 35
Countries citing papers authored by Neena John
This map shows the geographic impact of Neena John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neena John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neena John more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neena John
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neena John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neena John. The network helps show where Neena John may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neena John, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 122 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 100 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 72 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 69 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 61 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 58 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 53 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 23 | |
| 16 | Human resources and infrastructure for eye care in India: current status. | 2004 | 20 |
| 17 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 19 | Trends in Gender and Blindness in India. | 2016 | 5 |
| 20 | 2023 | 1 |
About Neena John
Neena John is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Safety Research and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Connexins and lens biology (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Disability Rights and Representation (1 paper), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (1 paper), Disability Education and Employment (1 paper), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (1 paper) and Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (257 citations), Epidemiology (188 citations), Biochemistry (34 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation) and Clinical Biochemistry (35 citations). Neena John has collaborated with scholars based in India, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Sanjeev Gupta, Astrid Fletcher, Praveen Vashist, Usha Chakravarthy, GVS Murthy, G. V. S. Murthy, Praveen Vashist, Giovanni Maraini, Monica Camparini and Kathryn Fitzpatrick. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Epidemiology, BMC Women s Health and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.