N.C. Scholtes

13 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

N.C. Scholtes
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Parasitology 292
  • Infectious Diseases 210
  • Virology 31
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 98
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 97
Replace Guido Fontgalland Coelho Linhares with:
Guido Fontgalland Coelho Linhares Brazil
S. Martinod Switzerland
R.Z. Machado Brazil
Saruda Tiwananthagorn Thailand
Alaa A. Ghazy Egypt
K. Moubri France
Yoshihito Kashiwazaki Japan
Estrella Pallas Pallas Spain
Bertis L. Glenn United States
Fumi Murakoshi Japan
N.C. Scholtes relative to Guido Fontgalland Coelho Linhares Brazil Guido Fontgalland Coelho Linhares's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Guido Fontgalland Coelho Linhares · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.C. Scholtes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.C. Scholtes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.C. Scholtes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.C. Scholtes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.C. Scholtes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.C. Scholtes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.C. Scholtes. The network helps show where N.C. Scholtes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside N.C. Scholtes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.C. Scholtes Line = papers co-authored together N.C. Scholtes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 199791
2 199243
3 200538
4 199729
5 199429
6 200128
7 199627
8 199526
9 200617
10 201716
11 200113
12 199812
13 20026

About N.C. Scholtes

N.C. Scholtes is a scholar working on Parasitology, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Immunology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vector-borne infectious diseases (10 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (5 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (4 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers), Malaria Research and Control (3 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (1 paper) and Animal Virus Infections Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (292 citations), Infectious Diseases (210 citations), Virology (31 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (98 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (97 citations). N.C. Scholtes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J.A.G.M. Kleuskens, Th.P.M. Schetters, A Gorenflot, K. Moubri, H Bos, Éric Précigout, Virgil E.J.C. Schijns, Winfried G.J. Degen, A.N. Vermeulen and Danny Goovaerts. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Parasitology, Parasite Immunology, Vaccine, Equine Veterinary Journal and Parasitology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact