Nathaniel Winer

2.0k citations
52 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Nathaniel Winer

51 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Nathaniel Winer
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 517
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 344
  • Pharmacology 250
  • Nephrology 80
  • Biochemistry 87
Replace Gordon S. Stokes with:
Gordon S. Stokes Australia
Charles S. Sweet United States
W. J. Louis Australia
Ole Lederballe Pedersen Denmark
Henry L. Elliott United Kingdom
R Sannerstedt Sweden
Richard Donnelly United Kingdom
Hiroshi Shionoiri Japan
Alberto Morganti Italy
G. G. Belz Germany
Nathaniel Winer relative to Gordon S. Stokes Australia Gordon S. Stokes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Gordon S. Stokes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Winer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Winer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Winer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Winer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Winer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Winer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Winer. The network helps show where Nathaniel Winer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel Winer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathaniel Winer Line = papers co-authored together Nathaniel Winer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969195
2 2004177
3 2002174
4 2005171
5 1971108
6 1979101
7 196666
8 197655
9
Induced myotonia in man and goat.
196552
10 197738
11 198137
12 200335
13 200135
14 200129
15 200528
16 196626
17 198719
18 201019
19 196818
20 200318

About Nathaniel Winer

Nathaniel Winer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Pharmacology and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (15 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (11 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (7 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (6 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (5 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (4 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (4 papers) and Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (517 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (344 citations), Pharmacology (250 citations), Nephrology (80 citations) and Biochemistry (87 citations). Nathaniel Winer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James R. Sowers, William D. Mason, Myung S. Yoon, Aaron D. Freedman, Samy I. McFarlane, Thomas W. Burns, Irving M. Cohen, Gregory M. Kochak, Michael A. Weber and Hans von Gizycki. Their work appears in journals such as Current Diabetes Reports, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The American Journal of Surgery and Current Hypertension Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact