Nathaniel Thomas

19 papers receiving 202 citations

Peers

Nathaniel Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 43
  • General Health Professions 54
  • Physiology 54
  • Clinical Psychology 43
Replace Frank Angelo with:
Frank Angelo United States
Debra K. Mooney United States
Carla López-Núñez Spain
Susa Reinhardt Germany
Racheal Reavy United States
Ying Ying Lee Singapore
Genevieve F. Dash United States
Jong Ik Park South Korea
Jan Halldin Sweden
Wendy I. Slavit United States
Nathaniel Thomas relative to Frank Angelo United States Frank Angelo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Frank Angelo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Thomas. The network helps show where Nathaniel Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathaniel Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Nathaniel Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198748
2 202125
3 201623
4 201620
5 202118
6 202017
7 201710
8 20229
9 20206
10 20245
11 19885
12 20184
13 20214
14 20233
15 20182
16 20242
17 20192
18 20231
19 20221
20 20250

About Nathaniel Thomas

Nathaniel Thomas is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Physiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (10 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (8 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (29 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (43 citations), General Health Professions (54 citations), Physiology (54 citations) and Clinical Psychology (43 citations). Nathaniel Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Danielle M. Dick, Kenneth S. Kendler, Amy Adkins, Karen G. Chartier, Leonard A. Jason, Charles L. Gruder, Brian R. Flay, Steven C. Martino, Richard B. Warnecke and Jessica E. Salvatore. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Psychological Medicine, Behavior Genetics, Addictive Behaviors and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact