Nathaniel Thomas

22 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Nathaniel Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Applied Psychology 20
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 33
  • General Health Professions 43
  • Physiology 44
  • Clinical Psychology 37
Replace Frank Angelo with:
Frank Angelo United States
Erin E. Hunt‐Carter United States
Michelle J. Zaso United States
Alyce M. Whipp Finland
Gemma Nieva Spain
Michelle Hsu Australia
Torunn Holm Totland Norway
K. Elizabeth United States
Brian J. Fairman United States
Racheal Reavy United States
Nathaniel Thomas relative to Frank Angelo United States Frank Angelo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Frank Angelo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Thomas. The network helps show where Nathaniel Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathaniel Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Nathaniel Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198751
2 202128
3 201624
4 201624
5 202119
6 202017
7 202210
8 201710
9 19887
10 20207
11 20246
12 20215
13 20234
14 20184
15 20243
16 20193
17 20232
18 20182
19 20251
20 20241

About Nathaniel Thomas

Nathaniel Thomas is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Genetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (7 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (20 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (33 citations), General Health Professions (43 citations), Physiology (44 citations) and Clinical Psychology (37 citations). Nathaniel Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Danielle M. Dick, Kenneth S. Kendler, Amy Adkins, Karen G. Chartier, Leonard A. Jason, Charles L. Gruder, Richard B. Warnecke, Brian R. Flay, Steven C. Martino and Jessica E. Salvatore. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Behavior Genetics, Psychological Medicine, Emerging Adulthood and Addiction Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact