Nathaniel Lee
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Papers in
-
- Leptospirosis research and findings 7
-
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 4
- Co-authors
- Michael Amendola (5 shared papers)Nital Appelbaum (4 shared papers)Philip Bloom (2 shared papers)Martin Leyland (2 shared papers)Kelley M. Dodson (3 shared papers)Brian J. Kaplan (3 shared papers)Edoardo Zinicola (1 shared paper)Candice Kim (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4 papers)Eye (3 papers)Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Journal of Vascular Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel Lee
36 papers receiving 636 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Ophthalmology 63
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 16
- Parasitology 33
- Epidemiology 129
- Genetics 39
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Lee
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Lee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Lee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Lee. The network helps show where Nathaniel Lee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 84 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 66 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 20 | Lucius Junius Brutus | 1967 | 7 |
About Nathaniel Lee
Nathaniel Lee is a scholar working on Parasitology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Leptospirosis research and findings (7 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (63 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (16 citations), Parasitology (33 citations), Epidemiology (129 citations) and Genetics (39 citations). Nathaniel Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Michael Amendola, Nital Appelbaum, Philip Bloom, Martin Leyland, Kelley M. Dodson, Brian J. Kaplan, Edoardo Zinicola, Candice Kim, Luke G. Wolfe and John Pfeifer. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Eye, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, PLoS ONE and Journal of Vascular Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.