Nathan Wright

29 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

Nathan Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 92
  • Paleontology 77
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 93
  • Nephrology 32
  • Archeology 5
Replace Cheryl Fitzgerald with:
Cheryl Fitzgerald United Kingdom
Sarah D. Blaschko United States
Michael J. Shkrum Canada
John Denton United Kingdom
S Duggleby United Kingdom
Joe Miller United States
J. R. Zanchetta Argentina
W. Berg Germany
Karen Stern United States
Márcio Antônio Babinski Brazil
Nathan Wright relative to Cheryl Fitzgerald United Kingdom Cheryl Fitzgerald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Cheryl Fitzgerald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Wright. The network helps show where Nathan Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Wright Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980174
2 201647
3 201741
4 201532
5 201516
6 201715
7 201815
8 197414
9
Acute poisoning. A comparison of hypnotic drugs.
197214
10 198113
11 201713
12 202311
13 202010
14 20199
15 20188
16
Acute paracetamol poisoning.
19758
17 20227
18 20215
19
Substrate reduction therapy in Sandhoff disease: Evidence for improvement in nervous function in patients treated with miglustat
20064
20 20204

About Nathan Wright

Nathan Wright is a scholar working on Paleontology, Surgery, Anthropology, Emergency Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 33 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (11 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (6 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (5 papers), Membrane Separation Technologies (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (4 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (3 papers) and Ancient Near East History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (92 citations), Paleontology (77 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (93 citations), Nephrology (32 citations) and Archeology (5 citations). Nathan Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Fairbairn, Shuvo Roy, Charles Blaha, J. Tyler Faith, William H. Fissell, Willieford Moses, Shant M. Vartanian, M. Cemre Üstünkaya, Benjamin W. Chui and Henry Matthew. Their work appears in journals such as Quaternary International, Bioengineering & Translational Medicine, Nature Communications, Journal of Biomaterials Applications and Journal of Archaeological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact