Nathan Stormer
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
Papers in
- Philosophy 15
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies 14
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 2
- Co-authors
- Bridie McGreavy (2 shared papers)Steve Evans (1 shared paper)John Ackerman (1 shared paper)Susan Wells (1 shared paper)Peter F. Pelz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Quarterly Journal of Speech (6 papers)Philosophy and Rhetoric (4 papers)Signs (2 papers)Critical Studies in Media Communication (2 papers)Women s Studies in Communication (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandGermany
In The Last Decade
Nathan Stormer
23 papers receiving 199 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Philosophy 123
- Literature and Literary Theory 70
- Geography, Planning and Development 33
- Communication 35
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 13
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Stormer
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Stormer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Stormer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Stormer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Stormer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Stormer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Stormer. The network helps show where Nathan Stormer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Stormer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 4 |
About Nathan Stormer
Nathan Stormer is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Cultural Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 30 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (14 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (2 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers) and American History and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (123 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (70 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (33 citations), Communication (35 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (13 citations). Nathan Stormer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Bridie McGreavy, Steve Evans, John Ackerman, Susan Wells and Peter F. Pelz. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Speech, Philosophy and Rhetoric, Signs, Critical Studies in Media Communication and Women s Studies in Communication.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.