Nathan Smith

823 citations
38 papers · 566 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports 9
    • Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking 4
    • Spaceflight effects on biology 10

Nathan Smith

34 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Nathan Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Applied Psychology 97
  • Social Psychology 329
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 179
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 8
  • Safety Research 76
Replace Sabine Würth with:
Sabine Würth Austria
O Jenny United States
Ermioni Katartzi Greece
Lisa Musculus Germany
Dennis Hrycaiko Canada
Claudia Crova Italy
Rosalba Marchetti Italy
David L. Porretta United States
Johannes W. de Greeff Netherlands
Vera van den Berg Netherlands
Nathan Smith relative to Sabine Würth Austria Sabine Würth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Sabine Würth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Smith. The network helps show where Nathan Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Smith Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201592
2 201565
3 201650
4 201848
5 201331
6 201623
7 202322
8 201420
9 201520
10 201718
11 201617
12 201817
13 202315
14 201714
15 201613
16 201812
17 201812
18 202211
19 202410
20 20197

About Nathan Smith

Nathan Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Physiology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spaceflight effects on biology (10 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (6 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (5 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (5 papers), Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking (4 papers) and Space Exploration and Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (97 citations), Social Psychology (329 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (179 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (8 citations) and Safety Research (76 citations). Nathan Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Joan L. Duda, Eleanor Quested, Paul R. Appleton, Gro Mjeldheim Sandal, Αθανάσιος Παπαϊωάννου, Damien Tessier, Philippe Sarrazin, Florence‐Emilie Kinnafick, Francesco Pagnini and Isabel Balaguer. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Stress and Health, npj Microgravity, Environment and Behavior and International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact