Nathan Smith

823 citations
38 papers · 599 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports 9
    • Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking 4
    • Spaceflight effects on biology 10

Nathan Smith

34 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

Nathan Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Applied Psychology 110
  • Social Psychology 347
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 187
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 8
  • Safety Research 77
Replace Ermioni Katartzi with:
Ermioni Katartzi Greece
Damian M. Stanley United Kingdom
Rosalba Marchetti Italy
David L. Porretta United States
Ingegerd Ericsson Sweden
Vera van den Berg Netherlands
Dennis Hrycaiko Canada
Günter Amesberger Austria
Chien‐Chih Chou Taiwan
Rocío Juárez-Ruiz de Mier Spain
Nathan Smith relative to Ermioni Katartzi Greece Ermioni Katartzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Ermioni Katartzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Smith. The network helps show where Nathan Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Smith Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201599
2 201567
3 201853
4 201652
5 201335
6 202327
7 201625
8 201521
9 201420
10 201718
11 201818
12 201617
13 202315
14 201715
15 201613
16 201812
17 201812
18 202211
19 202411
20
Lighting for health and safety
20008

About Nathan Smith

Nathan Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Physiology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spaceflight effects on biology (10 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (6 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (5 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (5 papers), Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking (4 papers) and Space Exploration and Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (110 citations), Social Psychology (347 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (187 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (8 citations) and Safety Research (77 citations). Nathan Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Joan L. Duda, Eleanor Quested, Paul R. Appleton, Gro Mjeldheim Sandal, Philippe Sarrazin, Αθανάσιος Παπαϊωάννου, Damien Tessier, Florence‐Emilie Kinnafick, Francesco Pagnini and Olivier White. Their work appears in journals such as npj Microgravity, Environment and Behavior, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Stress and Health and Journal of Environmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact