Nathan Schnaper

23 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Nathan Schnaper
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 118
  • Clinical Psychology 116
  • Social Psychology 89
  • Oncology 110
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 116
Replace Juan Antonio Cruzado with:
Juan Antonio Cruzado Spain
Barbara Monroe United Kingdom
Carol L. Alter United States
G. Potamianos United Kingdom
Mark R. Larson United States
Tina M. Gremore United States
Meredith Smith United States
Maria Alejandra Berardi Italy
Mariko Shiozaki Japan
Chelsea G. Ratcliff United States
Nathan Schnaper relative to Juan Antonio Cruzado Spain Juan Antonio Cruzado's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Juan Antonio Cruzado · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Schnaper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Schnaper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Schnaper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Schnaper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Schnaper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Schnaper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Schnaper. The network helps show where Nathan Schnaper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Schnaper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Schnaper Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Schnaper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991167
2 197863
3 199729
4 197724
5 197522
6 198319
7 197611
8 19819
9 19769
10 19809
11 19616
12 19865
13 19755
14 19785
15 19903
16 19613
17 19773
18 19692
19 19902
20 19772

About Nathan Schnaper

Nathan Schnaper is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (118 citations), Clinical Psychology (116 citations), Social Psychology (89 citations), Oncology (110 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (116 citations). Nathan Schnaper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Adams Cowley, Timothy J. Keay, Noralyn Davel Pickens, Ann M. O’Mara, Carla Alexander, Joseph Aisner, Merrill J. Egorin, Charles E. Riggs, Harold W. Schnaper and O. Michael Colvin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Religion and Health, Anesthesiology and The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact