Nathan Ross

23 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers

Nathan Ross
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Statistics and Probability 144
  • Mathematical Physics 107
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 32
  • Applied Mathematics 58
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 41
Replace Ravi Montenegro with:
Ravi Montenegro United States
Robert E. Gaunt United Kingdom
Gérard Letac France
Irina Shevtsova Russia
Philippe Chassaing France
Ralph Neininger Germany
Gady Kozma Israel
Peter March United States
Mindaugas Bloznelis Lithuania
Johan Jonasson Sweden
Nathan Ross relative to Ravi Montenegro United States Ravi Montenegro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Ravi Montenegro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Ross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Ross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Ross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Ross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Ross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Ross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Ross. The network helps show where Nathan Ross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Ross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Ross Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Ross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011176
2 201948
3 201919
4 201418
5 201514
6 201411
7 201310
8 201110
9 20199
10 20188
11 20117
12 20245
13 20175
14 20135
15 20185
16 20185
17 20184
18 20233
19 20242
20 20092

About Nathan Ross

Nathan Ross is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Mathematical Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Applied Mathematics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (10 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (8 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (6 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (4 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (4 papers), Wireless Communication Security Techniques (3 papers), Full-Duplex Wireless Communications (3 papers) and Stochastic processes and financial applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (144 citations), Mathematical Physics (107 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (32 citations), Applied Mathematics (58 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (41 citations). Nathan Ross has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Yindi Jing, Saman Atapattu, Adrian Röllin, Jamie Evans, Jim Pitman, David Aldous, A. D. Barbour, Elchanan Mossel, Junhyong Kim and Malin Premaratne. Their work appears in journals such as Bernoulli, Advances in Applied Probability, Electronic Journal of Probability, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis and Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact