Nathan Ridout

1.3k citations
38 papers · 872 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Ridout

36 papers receiving 838 citations

Peers

Nathan Ridout
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 256
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 255
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 24
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 252
  • Clinical Psychology 220
Replace Gill Terrett with:
Gill Terrett Australia
Markus Bahnemann Germany
Laura Visu‐Petra Romania
Paola Surcinelli Italy
Jennifer K. MacCormack United States
Ornella Montebarocci Italy
Janelle N. Beadle United States
Sebastián Javier Lipina Argentina
Beyon Miloyan Australia
Nathalie Mella Switzerland
Nathan Ridout relative to Gill Terrett Australia Gill Terrett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Gill Terrett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Ridout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Ridout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Ridout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Ridout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Ridout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Ridout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Ridout. The network helps show where Nathan Ridout may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Ridout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Ridout Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Ridout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003119
2 2018117
3 202194
4 200876
5 200953
6 202137
7 201234
8 200932
9 200731
10 201725
11 200719
12 201219
13 200818
14 200817
15 201516
16 201615
17 201614
18 201114
19 201812
20 201612

About Nathan Ridout

Nathan Ridout is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 872 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (11 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (9 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (7 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (6 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (256 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (255 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (24 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (252 citations) and Clinical Psychology (220 citations). Nathan Ridout has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Stefanie Hassel, Olivier Luminet, Kristy A. Nielson, Ronan E. O’Carroll, Deborah J. Wallis, Ian Reid, Arlene Astell, Thomas Glen, Carol Holland and Claudia Schoechlin. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition & Emotion, Memory, Psychiatry Research, Appetite and Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact