Nathan Pike

1.2k citations
20 papers · 955 · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Pike

20 papers receiving 936 citations

Nathan Pike's Hit Papers

Using false discovery rates for multiple comparisons in ecology and evolution 2010 · 503 citations
5030+5+10Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Nathan Pike
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Insect Science 270
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 304
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 130
  • Ecological Modeling 42
  • Ecology 216
Replace Todd L. Sformo with:
Todd L. Sformo United States
Stefan K. Hetz Germany
Philip G. D. Matthews Australia
Jan Landin Sweden
Ádám Egri Hungary
György Kriska Hungary
R. Stimson Wilcox United States
Charles V. Paganelli United States
Margaret A. Rubega United States
J. W. L. Beament United Kingdom
Nathan Pike relative to Todd L. Sformo United States Todd L. Sformo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Todd L. Sformo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Pike. The network helps show where Nathan Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Pike Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Pike links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Using false discovery rates for multiple comparisons in ecology and evolution
Hit paper breakdown →
2010503
2 2002126
3 200956
4 200448
5 201144
6 200431
7 200225
8 200723
9 200320
10 200316
11 200314
12 200711
13 200410
14 20048
15 20046
16 20066
17 20104
18 20062
19
Progressing from the SOC to the EOC.
20191
20 20101

About Nathan Pike

Nathan Pike is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Plant Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 955 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (10 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (4 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (270 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (304 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (130 citations), Ecological Modeling (42 citations) and Ecology (216 citations). Nathan Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include William A. Foster, Denis Richard, L. Mahadevan, A. Meats, William Y.S. Wang, Nina Hafer, Thomas N. Tully, Régis Ferrière, Patsy Haccou and Tobias Uller. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, BMC Evolutionary Biology, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Bulletin of Entomological Research and BMC Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact