Nathan Ning

590 citations
42 papers · 444 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Ning

39 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Nathan Ning
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 299
  • Environmental Chemistry 108
  • Ecology 273
  • Aquatic Science 68
  • Water Science and Technology 93
Replace Jack Imhof with:
Jack Imhof Canada
Matt A. Kulp United States
Amina Price Australia
William E. Ensign United States
Alastair Stephen United Kingdom
Shuchan Zhou China
Christopher T. Robinson United States
Joseph E. Gerken United States
Eric Mellina Canada
Nathan Ning relative to Jack Imhof Canada Jack Imhof's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Jack Imhof · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Ning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Ning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Ning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Ning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Ning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Ning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Ning. The network helps show where Nathan Ning may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Ning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Ning Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Ning links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202351
2 202129
3 201027
4 201227
5 201725
6 200922
7 201921
8 201518
9 201818
10 200917
11 201515
12 202014
13 201413
14 201111
15 201710
16 201910
17 20209
18 20159
19 20088
20 20227

About Nathan Ning

Nathan Ning is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Water Science and Technology and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 42 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (31 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (14 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (10 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (10 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (8 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (5 papers), Water resources management and optimization (5 papers) and Flood Risk Assessment and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (299 citations), Environmental Chemistry (108 citations), Ecology (273 citations), Aquatic Science (68 citations) and Water Science and Technology (93 citations). Nathan Ning has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Laos and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daryl L. Nielsen, Lee J. Baumgartner, Ben Gawne, Robert A. Cook, P. J. Suter, Wayne Robinson, Gavin N. Rees, Garry Thorncraft, Ana Horta and Darren S. Baldwin. Their work appears in journals such as Marine and Freshwater Research, Hydrobiologia, Fisheries Research, Ecological Engineering and River Research and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact