Nathan Lemons

764 citations
26 papers · 207 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Lemons

21 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Nathan Lemons
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 160
  • Geometry and Topology 103
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 129
  • Computational Mathematics 2
  • Algebra and Number Theory 10
Replace Hongliang Lu with:
Hongliang Lu China
Po‐Shen Loh United States
H. Tracy Hall United States
Adriana Hansberg Spain
Cláudia Linhares Sales Brazil
Henning Bruhn Germany
Maya Stein Chile
Wang Bing China
Juan José Montellano‐Ballesteros Mexico
Yury Person Germany
Nathan Lemons relative to Hongliang Lu China Hongliang Lu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Hongliang Lu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Lemons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Lemons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Lemons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Lemons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Lemons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Lemons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Lemons. The network helps show where Nathan Lemons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Lemons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Lemons Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Lemons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201233
2 201629
3 201226
4 201221
5 201115
6 202115
7 201014
8 201413
9 200810
10 20128
11 20114
12 20154
13 20093
14 20093
15 20122
16 20122
17 20211
18 20251
19 20151
20 20091

About Nathan Lemons

Nathan Lemons is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 26 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (15 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (10 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (7 papers), Graph theory and applications (5 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (4 papers), Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (4 papers), Digital Image Processing Techniques (2 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (160 citations), Geometry and Topology (103 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (129 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (10 citations). Nathan Lemons has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Ervin Győri, Gyula Y. Katona, Cory Palmer, Balázs Patkós, Balázs Keszegh, Dömötör Pálvölgyi, Dániel Gerbner, William S. Hlavacek, Bin Hu and Aric Hagberg. Their work appears in journals such as Graphs and Combinatorics, Discrete Mathematics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, European Journal of Combinatorics and The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact