Nathan Hogaboom

23 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Nathan Hogaboom
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 137
  • Occupational Therapy 33
  • Rehabilitation 24
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 28
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 37
Replace Arthur Jason De Luigi with:
Arthur Jason De Luigi United States
Ümüt Güzelküçük Türkiye
Miriam Hwang South Korea
Afaf A. M. Shaheen Saudi Arabia
Marco Bonomo Italy
Jean‐Claude Bernard France
Ali H. Alnahdi Saudi Arabia
Sabrina Donzelli Italy
Piotr Tederko Poland
Sophie Jennings Australia
Nathan Hogaboom relative to Arthur Jason De Luigi United States Arthur Jason De Luigi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Arthur Jason De Luigi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Hogaboom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Hogaboom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Hogaboom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Hogaboom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Hogaboom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Hogaboom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Hogaboom. The network helps show where Nathan Hogaboom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Hogaboom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Hogaboom Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Hogaboom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201431
2 201830
3 201629
4 201726
5 202026
6 201524
7 201918
8 201718
9 201915
10 201514
11 202114
12 201613
13 20168
14 20178
15 20218
16 20138
17 20207
18 20195
19 20165
20 20194

About Nathan Hogaboom

Nathan Hogaboom is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 23 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (12 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (6 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (1 paper) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (137 citations), Occupational Therapy (33 citations), Rehabilitation (24 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (28 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (37 citations). Nathan Hogaboom has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Michael L. Boninger, Lynn A. Worobey, Alicia M Koontz, Gerard A. Malanga, M. Oyster, Trevor A. Dyson‐Hudson, Allen W. Heinemann, Bethlyn Houlihan, Shivayogi V. Hiremath and Michael A. Pollack. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Clinical Biomechanics, PM&R and International Orthopaedics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact