Nathan Daniel Doty

16 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers

Nathan Daniel Doty
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Social Psychology 475
  • Reproductive Medicine 119
  • Gender Studies 103
  • Infectious Diseases 147
  • Clinical Psychology 165
Replace Alexis Dewaele with:
Alexis Dewaele Belgium
John Vincke Belgium
Sune M. Innala Sweden
Maggie Wells United States
Jeffrey Becker United States
Amber L. Hollibaugh United States
Robert Paul Cabaj United States
Rebecca E. Swinburne Romine United States
Monica Macri United States
Mona Mason United States
Nathan Daniel Doty relative to Alexis Dewaele Belgium Alexis Dewaele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alexis Dewaele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Daniel Doty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Daniel Doty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Daniel Doty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Daniel Doty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Daniel Doty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Daniel Doty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Daniel Doty. The network helps show where Nathan Daniel Doty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Daniel Doty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Daniel Doty Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Daniel Doty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2010254
2 201092
3 201076
4 200868
5 201065
6 199863
7 201537
8 200833
9 201432
10 201725
11 201011
12 201010
13 20146
14 20182
15 20181
16 20211

About Nathan Daniel Doty

Nathan Daniel Doty is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Clinical Psychology, Demography and General Health Professions, having authored 16 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Global Health and Surgery (1 paper), Homelessness and Social Issues (1 paper), Public Health Policies and Education (1 paper) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (475 citations), Reproductive Medicine (119 citations), Gender Studies (103 citations), Infectious Diseases (147 citations) and Clinical Psychology (165 citations). Nathan Daniel Doty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Brian L. B. Willoughby, Neena Malik, Kristin M. Lindahl, Rinad S. Beidas, Linda A. Hawkins, Jerilynn Radcliffe, Bret J. Rudy, Clare S. Gaskins, Michelle E. Barton and Darryl B. Hill. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Human Genetics, Parenting, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, Traumatology An International Journal and Journal of GLBT Family Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact