Nathan D. Dees
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Papers in
-
- Diffusion and Search Dynamics 3
- Gene expression and cancer classification 1
- Melanoma and MAPK Pathways 1
-
- stochastic dynamics and bifurcation 3
- Co-authors
- Richard K. Wilson (3 shared papers)Li Ding (2 shared papers)Elaine R. Mardis (2 shared papers)William Schierding (2 shared papers)Qunyuan Zhang (1 shared paper)Daniel C. Koboldt (1 shared paper)Cyriac Kandoth (1 shared paper)David J. Dooling (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Oncotarget (1 paper)PLoS Computational Biology (1 paper)Genome Research (1 paper)Journal of Theoretical Biology (1 paper)Physical Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nathan D. Dees
8 papers receiving 795 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cancer Research 461
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 114
- Molecular Biology 449
- Genetics 144
- Oncology 109
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan D. Dees
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan D. Dees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan D. Dees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan D. Dees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan D. Dees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan D. Dees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan D. Dees. The network helps show where Nathan D. Dees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan D. Dees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 437 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 298 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 8 | The role of stochastic resonance and physical constraints in the evolution of foraging strategy | 2009 | 1 |
About Nathan D. Dees
Nathan D. Dees is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Global and Planetary Change, Genetics and Cancer Research, having authored 8 papers that have together received 800 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diffusion and Search Dynamics (3 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (3 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (1 paper) and Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (461 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (114 citations), Molecular Biology (449 citations), Genetics (144 citations) and Oncology (109 citations). Nathan D. Dees has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard K. Wilson, Li Ding, Elaine R. Mardis, William Schierding, Qunyuan Zhang, Daniel C. Koboldt, Cyriac Kandoth, David J. Dooling, Thomas B. Mooney and Michael C. Wendl. Their work appears in journals such as Oncotarget, PLoS Computational Biology, Genome Research, Journal of Theoretical Biology and Physical Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.