Natasha Chugh

23 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Natasha Chugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Biochemistry 15
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 20
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 1
  • Cancer Research 31
Replace Hai Xiao with:
Hai Xiao China
Bharat Bhushan India
Beata Gruber Poland
Rasha S. Elbatanony Egypt
Ousama Rachid Qatar
Kyo Kobayashi Japan
Qian He China
Pratibha Chauhan India
Natasha Chugh relative to Hai Xiao China Hai Xiao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Hai Xiao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Chugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Chugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Chugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Chugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Chugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Chugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Chugh. The network helps show where Natasha Chugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha Chugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha Chugh Line = papers co-authored together Natasha Chugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201979
2 201839
3 201836
4 201924
5 201618
6 202216
7 202015
8 201913
9 201813
10 20198
11 20217
12 20226
13 20176
14 20205
15 20115
16
Safety evaluation of Aloe vera pulp aqueous extract based on histoarchitectural and biochemical alterations in mice
20175
17 20214
18 20223
19 20183
20 20252

About Natasha Chugh

Natasha Chugh is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers), Phytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (2 papers), Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (3 citations), Biochemistry (15 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (20 citations), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (1 citation) and Cancer Research (31 citations). Natasha Chugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ashwani Koul, Girijesh Kumar Patel, Manisha Tripathi, Jeffry A. Kelber, Frank L. Pasquale, Adrien R. Lavoie, M. L. Garg, S. C. Bansal, Mark Stephens and Margaret S. Chisolm. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films, Academic Medicine, Scientific Reports, Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis and The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact