Natasha Bear

77 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Natasha Bear
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 329
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 17
  • Neurology 129
  • Rehabilitation 51
  • Occupational Therapy 33
Replace John Gormley with:
John Gormley Ireland
Daniel López‐López Spain
Sidney M. Rubinstein Netherlands
Ian Story Australia
Thomas Brockow Germany
Henrica R. Schiphorst Preuper Netherlands
Şehim Kutlay Türkiye
Mikhail Saltychev Finland
Sevilay Karahan Türkiye
Susan Armijo Olivo Canada
Natasha Bear relative to John Gormley Ireland John Gormley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
John Gormley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Bear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Bear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Bear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Bear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Bear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Bear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Bear. The network helps show where Natasha Bear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha Bear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha Bear Line = papers co-authored together Natasha Bear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201157
2 201849
3 201844
4 201641
5 201639
6 201439
7 201739
8 201838
9 201537
10 201737
11 201533
12 202032
13 201932
14 201731
15 201531
16 201630
17 200926
18 202024
19 201822
20 201822

About Natasha Bear

Natasha Bear is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (17 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (5 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers) and Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (329 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (17 citations), Neurology (129 citations), Rehabilitation (51 citations) and Occupational Therapy (33 citations). Natasha Bear has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jane Valentine, Anne Smith, Noula Gibson, Catherine Elliott, A. M. Blackmore, Peter O’Sullivan, Leon Straker, Eve Blair, Katherine Stannage and Cyril J. Donnelly. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, BMJ Open, Disability and Rehabilitation, BMC Pediatrics and npj Digital Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact