Natalie Walker

94 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Natalie Walker's Hit Papers

Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial 2013 · 844 citations
8440+4+8Years since publication250500750

Peers

Natalie Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Physiology 1.8k
  • Applied Psychology 165
  • Rehabilitation 176
  • Occupational Therapy 78
  • Internal Medicine 61
Replace Wei Lang with:
Wei Lang United States
Thomas Stephens United States
Peter J. Carek United States
Kirsten L. Rennie United Kingdom
Tomasz Kostka Poland
Dean Ornish United States
Margaret Ashwell United Kingdom
Karen Ahijevych United States
J. S. Garrow United Kingdom
Jochanan Stessman Israel
Natalie Walker relative to Wei Lang United States Wei Lang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.3×
Wei Lang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Walker. The network helps show where Natalie Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Walker Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2013844
2 2005336
3 2015277
4 2014156
5 2007141
6 2008133
7 2010117
8 2019115
9 2016110
10 201479
11 201371
12 200370
13 201370
14 201566
15 201262
16 202060
17 200959
18 201049
19 202244
20 200843

About Natalie Walker

Natalie Walker is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (46 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (6 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (6 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.8k citations), Applied Psychology (165 citations), Rehabilitation (176 citations), Occupational Therapy (78 citations) and Internal Medicine (61 citations). Natalie Walker has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Varsha Parag, Chris Bullen, Hayden McRobbie, Murray Laugesen, Colin Howe, Jonathan Williman, Andrew Jull, Anthony Rodgers, Marewa Glover and Sohan Deshpande. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, BMC Public Health, Addiction, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Tobacco Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact