Natalie Kwit

19 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Natalie Kwit
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Infectious Diseases 259
  • Parasitology 76
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 298
  • Modeling and Simulation 45
  • Virology 15
Replace Marta Arsuaga with:
Marta Arsuaga Spain
Ana Carolina Bernardes Terzian Brazil
Kyle Ryff Puerto Rico
Elisabeth Krow‐Lucal United States
Khoa T. D. Thai Netherlands
Erik Kristjanson Canada
Ingrid B. Rabe United States
Elsa Balleydier France
Elizabeth A. Hunsperger United States
María Almirón United States
Natalie Kwit relative to Marta Arsuaga Spain Marta Arsuaga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Marta Arsuaga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Kwit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Kwit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Kwit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Kwit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Kwit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Kwit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Kwit. The network helps show where Natalie Kwit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Kwit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Kwit Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Kwit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2016247
2 201648
3 202028
4 201824
5 201719
6 201914
7 201910
8 20237
9 20246
10 20176
11 20185
12 20224
13 20224
14 20194
15 20203
16 20162
17 20242
18 20172
19 20221
20 20180

About Natalie Kwit

Natalie Kwit is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Parasitology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral Infections and Vectors (11 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (9 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (7 papers), Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (5 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (4 papers), Poxvirus research and outbreaks (2 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (2 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (259 citations), Parasitology (76 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (298 citations), Modeling and Simulation (45 citations) and Virology (15 citations). Natalie Kwit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. Mead, Morgan Hennessey, Wendy M. Chung, John T. Brooks, Jessica C. Smith, Christina A. Nelson, Kiersten J. Kugeler, Amy Schwartz, Cara C. Cherry and Patsy Kelso. Their work appears in journals such as MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Zoonoses and Public Health, Emerging infectious diseases, Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases and Journal of Wildlife Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact