Natalie E. Sheils

21 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

Natalie E. Sheils
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Modeling and Simulation 36
  • Mathematical Physics 59
  • Infectious Diseases 98
  • Numerical Analysis 30
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 52
Replace Zhu Jiang with:
Zhu Jiang China
Francesca Scarabel Italy
Guy Baruch Israel
Sergio Oliva Brazil
Youngjoon Hong United States
Keji Liu China
Vinicius Albani Brazil
Zhihua Liu France
Hua Gu China
Natalie E. Sheils relative to Zhu Jiang China Zhu Jiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Zhu Jiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie E. Sheils

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie E. Sheils's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie E. Sheils with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie E. Sheils more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie E. Sheils

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie E. Sheils. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie E. Sheils. The network helps show where Natalie E. Sheils may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie E. Sheils, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie E. Sheils Line = papers co-authored together Natalie E. Sheils links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020146
2 202175
3 202233
4 202130
5 201329
6 202224
7 202119
8 201619
9 201417
10 202217
11 202216
12 202216
13 201514
14 201713
15 20229
16 20107
17 20225
18 20224
19 20214
20 20224

About Natalie E. Sheils

Natalie E. Sheils is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Clinical Psychology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Infectious Diseases and Numerical Analysis, having authored 22 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (3 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (2 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (2 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (1 paper), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper) and Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (36 citations), Mathematical Physics (59 citations), Infectious Diseases (98 citations), Numerical Analysis (30 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (52 citations). Natalie E. Sheils has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include John Buresh, David A. Asch, Rachel M. Werner, Yong Chen, Jalpa A. Doshi, Bernard Deconinck, David A. Smith, Nazmul Islam, Ken Cohen and Chongliang Luo. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA Network Open, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, BioData Mining, The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal and Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact