Natalie Chan
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions 1
- Oncology 2
- COVID-19 and healthcare impacts 1
- Cancer survivorship and care 1
- Co-authors
- Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley (1 shared paper)Daniel Hind (1 shared paper)Claire Bone (1 shared paper)Elena Sheldon (1 shared paper)Michael Barkham (1 shared paper)Samuel M. Y. Ho (2 shared papers)Nabil Samman (2 shared papers)Rama Krsna Rajandram (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Health (1 paper)Journal of Geriatric Oncology (1 paper)European Journal of Pain (1 paper)Journal of Affective Disorders (1 paper)Oral Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSingaporeUnited States
In The Last Decade
Natalie Chan
10 papers receiving 770 citations
Natalie Chan's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Applied Psychology 119
- Clinical Psychology 270
- Social Psychology 128
- Health 44
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 57
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Chan
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Chan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Chan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Chan. The network helps show where Natalie Chan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 340 |
| 2 | 2020 | 143 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 88 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 84 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 80 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 |
About Natalie Chan
Natalie Chan is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Pharmacology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 785 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (1 paper), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (1 paper), Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (119 citations), Clinical Psychology (270 citations), Social Psychology (128 citations), Health (44 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (57 citations). Natalie Chan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley, Daniel Hind, Claire Bone, Elena Sheldon, Michael Barkham, Samuel M. Y. Ho, Nabil Samman, Rama Krsna Rajandram, Colman McGrath and Roger A. Zwahlen. Their work appears in journals such as International Health, Journal of Geriatric Oncology, European Journal of Pain, Journal of Affective Disorders and Oral Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.