Nancy Schwartz

17 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Nancy Schwartz
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Literature and Literary Theory 160
  • Applied Psychology 53
  • Communication 58
  • Marketing 68
  • Family Practice 10
Replace Sarah E. Vaala with:
Sarah E. Vaala United States
Erin Willis United States
Ashley Sanders‐Jackson United States
T. Makana Chock United States
Hannah K. Jarman Australia
Stephanie Lee Sargent United States
Rachel L. Bailey United States
Alice Binder Austria
Alyssa Saiphoo Canada
Kate Blackburn United States
Nancy Schwartz relative to Sarah E. Vaala United States Sarah E. Vaala's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Sarah E. Vaala · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Schwartz. The network helps show where Nancy Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Schwartz Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Schwartz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2000161
2
Food for thought: television food advertising to children in the United States
2007135
3 200883
4 200454
5 200542
6 200431
7 200313
8 200212
9 200712
10 199912
11 20069
12 20148
13 20087
14
"What Is It?" Orienting to Structural Features of Radio Messages.
19974
15 20053
16
A Team Approach to Cooperative Learning.
19951
17
SURFING FOR VALUE.
19991
18
Integral or irrelevant? The impact of animation and sound effects on *attention and memory for multimedia messages
20051
19 20021

About Nancy Schwartz

Nancy Schwartz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Communication and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (160 citations), Applied Psychology (53 citations), Communication (58 citations), Marketing (68 citations) and Family Practice (10 citations). Nancy Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Annie Lang, Walter Gantz, James R. Angelini, Victoria Rideout, Shuhua Zhou, Robert F. Potter, Paul D. Bolls, Richard C. Goldsworthy, Christopher B. Mayhorn and Yongkuk Chung. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications, New Media & Society and Journal of Adolescent Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact