Nancy Rader

669 citations
22 papers · 451 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Nancy Rader

22 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

Nancy Rader
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 267
  • General Psychology 9
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 134
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
  • Developmental Biology 13
Replace Thérèse Gouin Décarie with:
Thérèse Gouin Décarie Canada
J. Jaffe United States
S Feldstein United States
Michael M. Marcell United States
Lana B. Karasik United States
Beulah Amsterdam United States
Barbara D’Entremont Canada
Sharon Silber United States
Eugene Abravanel United States
Robert A. Haaf United States
Nancy Rader relative to Thérèse Gouin Décarie Canada Thérèse Gouin Décarie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Thérèse Gouin Décarie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Rader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Rader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Rader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Rader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Rader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Rader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Rader. The network helps show where Nancy Rader may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Rader, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Rader Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Rader links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201248
2 201048
3 198346
4 200444
5 198639
6
Attention. The perceiver as performer
197938
7 198027
8 198026
9
Visually elicited reaching in neonates.
198225
10 198220
11 198120
12 198114
13 201513
14 197913
15 19799
16 20136
17 20005
18 20183
19 20212
20 20192

About Nancy Rader

Nancy Rader is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (5 papers), Language Development and Disorders (4 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (267 citations), General Psychology (9 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (134 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations) and Developmental Biology (13 citations). Nancy Rader has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John E. Richards, Walery Żukow, Alexander J. Tymchuk, Joseph G. Ouslander, Leigh Ann Vaughn and Xinran Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Language Sciences, Ecological Psychology and Gesture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact