Nabíl Schear

447 citations
15 papers · 210 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Nabíl Schear

14 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Nabíl Schear
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Signal Processing 93
  • Computer Networks and Communications 115
  • Information Systems 106
  • Artificial Intelligence 144
  • Software 7
Replace Karl Dias with:
Karl Dias United States
Ashish Gupta India
Leonidas Galanis United States
Sergio Loureiro France
Richard Tibbetts United States
Daniel C. Zilio Canada
Matthias Nicola United States
Matthias Brantner Germany
S. Y. Noh South Korea
Theodore W. Hong United Kingdom
Nabíl Schear relative to Karl Dias United States Karl Dias's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Karl Dias · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nabíl Schear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nabíl Schear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nabíl Schear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nabíl Schear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nabíl Schear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nabíl Schear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nabíl Schear. The network helps show where Nabíl Schear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nabíl Schear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nabíl Schear Line = papers co-authored together Nabíl Schear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200942
2 201439
3 201728
4 201627
5 201021
6
Glavlit: Preventing Exfiltration at Wire Speed.
200619
7 20097
8 20177
9 20087
10 20166
11
Secure and Resilient Cloud Computing for the Department of Defense
20153
12
Automated Provenance Analytics: A Regular Grammar Based Approach with Applications in Security.
20172
13
Preventing encrypted traffic analysis
20111
14 20161
15
Security and Privacy Assurance Research (SPAR) Pilot Final Report
20150

About Nabíl Schear

Nabíl Schear is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Signal Processing, having authored 15 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cloud Data Security Solutions (5 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (5 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (4 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (4 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (3 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (3 papers) and Network Traffic and Congestion Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (93 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (115 citations), Information Systems (106 citations), Artificial Intelligence (144 citations) and Software (7 citations). Nabíl Schear has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Moyer, Arkady Yerukhimovich, Emily Shen, Sophia Yakoubov, Vijay Gadepally, David M. Nicol, Samuel T. King, Qing Zhang, Wajih Ul Hassan and Kevin Butler. Their work appears in journals such as SIMULATION.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact