N Wolf
Impact in
- Pharmaceutical Science top 10%
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery 2
- Co-authors
- Sarah Hedtrich (2 shared papers)Monika Schäfer‐Korting (2 shared papers)Günther Weindl (2 shared papers)Georg Heinkele (1 shared paper)Jörg König (1 shared paper)Frank Dörje (1 shared paper)Daniel Auge (1 shared paper)Katrin Singer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics (1 paper)Drug Metabolism and Disposition (1 paper)Journal of Biotechnology (1 paper)PubMed (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
N Wolf
4 papers receiving 324 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Pharmaceutical Science 48
- Rehabilitation 50
- Pharmacology 54
- Drug Discovery 1
- Oncology 122
Countries citing papers authored by N Wolf
This map shows the geographic impact of N Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N Wolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N Wolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N Wolf. The network helps show where N Wolf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside N Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 168 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 91 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 77 | |
| 4 | [Evaluation of ambulatory orthopedic-traumatologic rehabilitation by compensation insurance. A comparison with inpatient rehabilitation]. | 1999 | 1 |
| 5 | [Recommendation for rehabilitation measures of elderly disabled patients by the medical service of hospital insurance in Berlin and Brandenburg]. | 1998 | 0 |
| 6 | [Combined aminophenazone therapy]. | 1957 | 0 |
About N Wolf
N Wolf is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Pharmaceutical Science, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Infectious Diseases and General Health Professions, having authored 6 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (1 paper), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (1 paper), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (1 paper) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (48 citations), Rehabilitation (50 citations), Pharmacology (54 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation) and Oncology (122 citations). N Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Hedtrich, Monika Schäfer‐Korting, Günther Weindl, Georg Heinkele, Jörg König, Frank Dörje, Daniel Auge, Katrin Singer, Martin F. Fromm and Annick Seithel. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Journal of Biotechnology and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.