N. Scheerbaum

1.7k citations
34 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

N. Scheerbaum

33 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

N. Scheerbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 825
  • Materials Chemistry 1.4k
  • Mechanical Engineering 476
  • Mechanics of Materials 167
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
Replace M.J. Szczerba with:
M.J. Szczerba Poland
Paweł Czaja Poland
Daoyong Cong China
K. Morii Japan
Christoph Chluba Germany
R. Santamarta Spain
B. Basaran United States
Robert Zarnetta Germany
Hinnerk Oßmer Germany
Mingfang Qian China
N. Scheerbaum relative to M.J. Szczerba Poland M.J. Szczerba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
M.J. Szczerba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Scheerbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Scheerbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Scheerbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Scheerbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Scheerbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Scheerbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Scheerbaum. The network helps show where N. Scheerbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Scheerbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Scheerbaum Line = papers co-authored together N. Scheerbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009144
2 2008116
3 2007101
4 200898
5 200791
6 200783
7 200976
8 201071
9 200769
10 200861
11 200859
12 200851
13 201244
14 201043
15 200940
16 200933
17 200925
18 201024
19 200621
20 200720

About N. Scheerbaum

N. Scheerbaum is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shape Memory Alloy Transformations (20 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (11 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (9 papers), Metallurgy and Material Forming (8 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (5 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (5 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (4 papers) and Magnetic Properties of Alloys (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (825 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.4k citations), Mechanical Engineering (476 citations), Mechanics of Materials (167 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations). N. Scheerbaum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, India and France. Frequent co-authors include Oliver Gutfleisch, L. Schultz, Jian Liu, D. Hinz, László S. Tóth, Jian Liu, Werner Skrotzki, Julia Lyubina, T.G. Woodcock and Jeffrey McCord. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Materialia, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, New Journal of Physics and Advanced Engineering Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact