N. Rohm

16 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

N. Rohm
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Animal Science and Zoology 116
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 174
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 140
  • Molecular Biology 279
  • Physiology 88
Replace J. Chr. Reidemeister with:
J. Chr. Reidemeister Germany
N.M. Deighton United Kingdom
Doreen Sarsero Australia
Marie-Jeanne Mathy Netherlands
Sheng-Jun Zhang United States
Masayuki Endou Japan
Martina B. Michel-Reher Germany
L. Guarneri Italy
Elisabeth Tuisl Austria
O Aprigliano United States
N. Rohm relative to J. Chr. Reidemeister Germany J. Chr. Reidemeister's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. Chr. Reidemeister · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Rohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Rohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Rohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Rohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Rohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Rohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Rohm. The network helps show where N. Rohm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside N. Rohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Rohm Line = papers co-authored together N. Rohm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 198396
2 198462
3 198659
4 198457
5 198049
6 198444
7 198633
8 198012
9
On the coexistence of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors in various organs.
19819
10 19867
11 19856
12 19886
13 19844
14 19872
15
[New treatment concept of tumor-caused chylothorax using fibrin glue. A clinical case report].
19831
16
[Traumatic bilateral renal artery occlusion. Case report and review of the literature].
19901

About N. Rohm

N. Rohm is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Animal Science and Zoology and Neurology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (116 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (174 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (140 citations), Molecular Biology (279 citations) and Physiology (88 citations). N. Rohm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Togo. Frequent co-authors include Otto‐Erich Brodde, Hans‐Reinhard Zerkowski, J. Chr. Reidemeister, H.-R. Zerkowski, J C Reidemeister, H.–R. Zerkowski, J. Wagner, Katsumi Ikezono, H. J. Sch�mann and F Hentrich. Their work appears in journals such as Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology, The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Circulation Research and European Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact