N. Neto

2.9k citations
118 papers · 2.5k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

N. Neto

116 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

N. Neto
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 479
  • Materials Chemistry 1.4k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 477
  • Spectroscopy 354
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 579
Replace Hajime Hoshi with:
Hajime Hoshi Japan
Eun‐Cheol Lee South Korea
Jan Jadżyn Poland
Puspendu K. Das India
G. Dellepiane Italy
Derek Jones Italy
Piotr Bojarski Poland
R. Rossetti Italy
Wojciech Bartkowiak Poland
S. P. Bhattacharyya India
N. Neto relative to Hajime Hoshi Japan Hajime Hoshi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.2×
Hajime Hoshi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Neto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Neto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Neto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Neto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Neto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Neto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Neto. The network helps show where N. Neto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Neto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Neto Line = papers co-authored together N. Neto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966170
2 2011129
3 1973125
4 196786
5 200578
6 196673
7 200571
8 197965
9 197864
10 198359
11 201047
12 198346
13 200644
14 201143
15 200643
16 200843
17 201038
18 199036
19 196935
20 201334

About N. Neto

N. Neto is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 118 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (35 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (20 papers), Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (19 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (18 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (16 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (15 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (12 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (479 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.4k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (477 citations), Spectroscopy (354 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (579 citations). N. Neto has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. Califano, Maurizio Muniz‐Miranda, Sérgio Carlos Zílio, G. Sbrana, E. Castellucci, Marisa Scrocco, C. di Lauro, Pablo José Gonçalves, Leonardo De Boni and L. Misoguti. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact