N. Cue

1.9k citations
108 papers · 1.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

  • Radiation top 1%
    • X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
    • Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
    • Nuclear Physics and Applications

Papers in

N. Cue

105 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

N. Cue
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Structural Biology 110
  • Radiation 624
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 54
  • Condensed Matter Physics 579
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 312
Replace R. Tobey with:
R. Tobey United States
A. H. Chin United States
R. Treusch Germany
Mikihiko Ikezawa Japan
Z. L. Mišković Canada
J. C. Kimball United States
R. Mayol Spain
R. Coussement Belgium
Richard L. Sandberg United States
N. Tzoar United States
N. Cue relative to R. Tobey United States R. Tobey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R. Tobey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Cue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Cue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Cue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Cue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Cue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Cue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Cue. The network helps show where N. Cue may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Cue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Cue Line = papers co-authored together N. Cue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198571
2 199671
3 198067
4 198063
5 198661
6 199549
7 199946
8 197643
9 198741
10 198237
11 199636
12 199835
13 197034
14 198433
15 200231
16 198830
17 198329
18 198928
19 197628
20 198527

About N. Cue

N. Cue is a scholar working on Radiation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 108 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena (30 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (20 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (19 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (19 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (18 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (15 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (14 papers) and Nuclear materials and radiation effects (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (110 citations), Radiation (624 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (54 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (579 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (312 citations). N. Cue has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include J. C. Kimball, J. Rémillieux, M. J. Gaillard, J.C. Poizat, Forrest Hopkins, Shihe Yang, A. Belkacem, Xuesen Wang, Nian Lin and K. M. Yoo. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters A, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Physics Letters B and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact