N. Conte
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 3
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 2
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 1
- Co-authors
- M. Costa (2 shared papers)S Chiodi (1 shared paper)Paola Anserini (1 shared paper)Andrea Bacigalupo (1 shared paper)F Copello (1 shared paper)S Spinelli (1 shared paper)Luca Bernardini (3 shared papers)P. L. Venturini (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Human Reproduction (1 paper)Bone Marrow Transplantation (1 paper)Reproductive BioMedicine Online (1 paper)Tumori Journal (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
N. Conte
4 papers receiving 307 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Reproductive Medicine 173
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 156
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 81
- Hematology 28
- Genetics 70
Countries citing papers authored by N. Conte
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Conte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Conte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Conte. The network helps show where N. Conte may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside N. Conte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 145 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 80 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 48 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 47 | |
| 5 | Potential of endocervical lavage for cytogenetic investigation of fetal cells as determined by in situ hybridization. | 1998 | 0 |
About N. Conte
N. Conte is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Reproductive Medicine and Hematology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (1 paper) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (173 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (156 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (81 citations), Hematology (28 citations) and Genetics (70 citations). N. Conte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Costa, S Chiodi, Paola Anserini, Andrea Bacigalupo, F Copello, S Spinelli, Luca Bernardini, P. L. Venturini, Andrea Borini and C Flamigni. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Tumori Journal and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.