N. Booth

58 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

N. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 469
  • Mechanics of Materials 331
  • Geophysics 149
  • Radiation 89
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 324
Replace Jianhui Bin with:
Jianhui Bin Germany
B. Aurand Germany
R. J. Dance United Kingdom
N. M. H. Butler United Kingdom
R. Capdessus United Kingdom
F. Nürnberg Germany
O. Deppert Germany
M. Rabec Le Gloahec France
Oswald Willi Germany
M. King United Kingdom
N. Booth relative to Jianhui Bin Germany Jianhui Bin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jianhui Bin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Booth. The network helps show where N. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Booth Line = papers co-authored together N. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201651
2 201450
3 201341
4 202033
5 201329
6 200628
7
Selective Ion Acceleration by Intense Radiation Pressure
202122
8 201420
9 201720
10 201320
11 201517
12 201816
13 201913
14 202013
15 201612
16 202011
17 202011
18 201611
19 20149
20 20189

About N. Booth

N. Booth is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Geophysics and Radiation, having authored 62 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (56 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (32 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (19 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (16 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (12 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (7 papers), Laser Design and Applications (6 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (469 citations), Mechanics of Materials (331 citations), Geophysics (149 citations), Radiation (89 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (324 citations). N. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include P. McKenna, R. J. Gray, R. J. Dance, D. Neely, D. C. Carroll, D. A. MacLellan, N. C. Woolsey, C. D. Murphy, A. P. L. Robinson and С. А. Пикуз. Their work appears in journals such as High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Physical Review Letters, High Energy Density Physics, Physics of Plasmas and Laser and Particle Beams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact