K. Glize

32 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

K. Glize
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 281
  • Mechanics of Materials 192
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 185
  • Geophysics 69
  • Computational Mechanics 25
Replace Guo-Bo Zhang with:
Guo-Bo Zhang China
M. J. Bonino United States
Tom Dittrich United States
R. C. Shah United States
Kathy Opachich United States
Tatsuhiko Sakaiya Japan
V. B. Rozanov Russia
Chao Gong China
D. C. Wilson United States
N. N. Demchenko Russia
K. Glize relative to Guo-Bo Zhang China Guo-Bo Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Guo-Bo Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Glize

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Glize's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Glize with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Glize more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Glize

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Glize. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Glize. The network helps show where K. Glize may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Glize, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Glize Line = papers co-authored together K. Glize links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202046
2 202125
3 201925
4 201621
5 202119
6 201517
7 202216
8 201715
9 202015
10 202313
11 201613
12 201913
13 202013
14 20229
15 20229
16 20189
17 20238
18 20206
19 20175
20 20215

About K. Glize

K. Glize is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Geophysics and Radiation, having authored 35 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (33 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (26 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (13 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (9 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (3 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (2 papers) and Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (281 citations), Mechanics of Materials (192 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (185 citations), Geophysics (69 citations) and Computational Mechanics (25 citations). K. Glize has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include S. D. Baton, R. H. H. Scott, Laurent Gremillet, Didier Bénisti, L. Lancia, Peter Norreys, Nigel C. Woolsey, L. Antonelli, Andrey Solodov and John Moody. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics of Plasmas, Review of Scientific Instruments, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion and High Energy Density Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact