M.R. Baum

27 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

M.R. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 171
  • General Materials Science 42
  • Aerospace Engineering 202
  • Chemical Health and Safety 5
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 66
Replace I. Liebman with:
I. Liebman United States
Sergii Kashkarov United Kingdom
Sevostian Bechta Sweden
Xiaozhe Yu China
Dieter Gabel Germany
Alex Velicki United States
Jian Yao China
Anthony M. Calomino United States
Jingjie Ren China
M.R. Baum relative to I. Liebman United States I. Liebman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
I. Liebman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.R. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.R. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.R. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.R. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.R. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.R. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.R. Baum. The network helps show where M.R. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside M.R. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.R. Baum Line = papers co-authored together M.R. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196960
2 198845
3 197541
4 199937
5 199829
6 199128
7 199527
8 200124
9 198422
10 198212
11 199912
12
Gas entrainment at the free surface of a liquid. Entrainment inception at a laminar vortex
197412
13 199310
14 19799
15 19859
16 19828
17 19915
18 19915
19 19964
20 19844

About M.R. Baum

M.R. Baum is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Civil and Structural Engineering, General Materials Science and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 29 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (12 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (11 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (8 papers), Engineering and Material Science Research (7 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (4 papers), Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (4 papers), Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis (3 papers) and Fatigue and fracture mechanics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (171 citations), General Materials Science (42 citations), Aerospace Engineering (202 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (5 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (66 citations). M.R. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include B. N. Cole, Paul Barr, Joseph Butterfield and K.H. Ardron. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Nuclear Engineering and Design, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping and Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact