Moty Schultz

858 citations
41 papers · 685 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Moty Schultz

41 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Moty Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Condensed Matter Physics 174
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 336
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 187
  • Materials Chemistry 263
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 241
Replace Nissim Amos with:
Nissim Amos United States
A. Aissat Algeria
Shuxiao Zhang China
Masudur Rahman United States
Sining Mao United States
Jae‐Seong Park South Korea
T. Sato Japan
Yongjun Dong China
Tomasz J. Ochalski Ireland
Yang Mei China
Moty Schultz relative to Nissim Amos United States Nissim Amos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Nissim Amos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Moty Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Moty Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moty Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moty Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Moty Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moty Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moty Schultz. The network helps show where Moty Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Moty Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Moty Schultz Line = papers co-authored together Moty Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199699
2 201681
3 201967
4 199845
5 201141
6 201133
7 201328
8 200927
9 201924
10 201222
11 200720
12 202015
13 201315
14 201912
15 201211
16 201610
17 201610
18 200010
19 202010
20 20019

About Moty Schultz

Moty Schultz is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (14 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (14 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (11 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (10 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (7 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (5 papers), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (5 papers) and Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (174 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (336 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (187 citations), Materials Chemistry (263 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (241 citations). Moty Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lior Klein, Eli Sloutskin, T. Colin, U. Merkt, T. Skauli, Asaf Grosz, James W. Reiner, А. В. Бутенко, Moshe Deutsch and B. M. Ocko. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review B, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Applied Physics Letters and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact