Mona Arbab

41 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers

Mona Arbab
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 105
  • Physiology 69
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 80
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 53
Replace Fernando F. Gonzalez with:
Fernando F. Gonzalez United States
Robert Carlier France
David Houghton United States
Nestoras Papadopoulos Germany
J Gintautas United States
J. Javier Provencio United States
George Mychaskiw United States
Hans-Christian Hansen Germany
Andrea Rigamonti Italy
Keiko Kinouchi Japan
Mona Arbab relative to Fernando F. Gonzalez United States Fernando F. Gonzalez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Fernando F. Gonzalez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mona Arbab

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mona Arbab's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mona Arbab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mona Arbab more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mona Arbab

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mona Arbab. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mona Arbab. The network helps show where Mona Arbab may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mona Arbab, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mona Arbab Line = papers co-authored together Mona Arbab links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986162
2 2018112
3 201569
4 201552
5 199146
6 201730
7 202124
8 201423
9 201717
10
Distance Learning Can Be as Effective as Traditional Learning for Medical Students in the Initial Assessment of Trauma Patients.
201615
11 201915
12 202210
13 20118
14 20177
15 20227
16 20206
17 20236
18 20145
19 20175
20 20244

About Mona Arbab

Mona Arbab is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (10 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (8 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (6 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (4 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (4 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (105 citations), Physiology (69 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (80 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (53 citations). Mona Arbab has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iran and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include N. Aa. Svendgaard, Leif Wiklund, Shervin Farahmand, Shahram Bagheri-Hariri, Mojtaba Sedaghat, Jan Erik Hardebo, Hadi Mirfazaelian, Mohammad Jalili, Norihiro Suzuki and Amin Doosti‐Irani. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Radiology, Advances in Radiation Oncology and Head & Neck.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact