Mohammed BenDebba
Impact in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 11
- Pharmacology 10
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 10
- Co-authors
- Thomas B. Ducker (4 shared papers)John D. Davis (2 shared papers)Prakash Sampath (2 shared papers)Donlin M. Long (8 shared papers)Warren S. Torgerson (7 shared papers)John G. Heller (2 shared papers)Don M. Long (3 shared papers)Nelson Hendler (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Spine (7 papers)Pain (5 papers)Radiology (2 papers)The Spine Journal (1 paper)Journal of neurosurgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Mohammed BenDebba
23 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 497
- Pharmacology 345
- Surgery 585
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 60
- Psychiatry and Mental health 40
Countries citing papers authored by Mohammed BenDebba
This map shows the geographic impact of Mohammed BenDebba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohammed BenDebba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohammed BenDebba more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mohammed BenDebba
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohammed BenDebba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohammed BenDebba. The network helps show where Mohammed BenDebba may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohammed BenDebba, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 228 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 146 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 123 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 115 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 79 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 73 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 65 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 43 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 41 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 37 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 20 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 12 |
About Mohammed BenDebba
Mohammed BenDebba is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health and Physiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (11 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (2 papers), Advanced Scientific Research Methods (1 paper) and Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (497 citations), Pharmacology (345 citations), Surgery (585 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (60 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (40 citations). Mohammed BenDebba has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Thomas B. Ducker, John D. Davis, Prakash Sampath, Donlin M. Long, Warren S. Torgerson, John G. Heller, Don M. Long, Nelson Hendler, Gere S. diZerega and Russell W. Hardy. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Pain, Radiology, The Spine Journal and Journal of neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.