Mohammad Amin

1.7k citations
130 papers · 982 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Mohammad Amin

117 papers receiving 820 citations

Peers

Mohammad Amin
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Business and International Management 60
  • Economics and Econometrics 510
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 139
  • Gender Studies 153
  • Accounting 167
Replace Byung‐Yeon Kim with:
Byung‐Yeon Kim South Korea
Moshe Justman Israel
Mina Baliamoune‐Lutz United States
Nabamita Dutta United States
David Aristei Italy
Stefan Fölster Sweden
David Cuberes United States
Francisco Lima Portugal
David Kučera Switzerland
Phanindra V. Wunnava United States
Mohammad Amin relative to Byung‐Yeon Kim South Korea Byung‐Yeon Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Byung‐Yeon Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mohammad Amin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohammad Amin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohammad Amin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohammad Amin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohammad Amin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohammad Amin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohammad Amin. The network helps show where Mohammad Amin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohammad Amin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mohammad Amin Line = papers co-authored together Mohammad Amin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200852
2 201550
3 202046
4 201838
5 202036
6 200832
7 201430
8 202026
9 201923
10 201523
11 201421
12 201120
13 201619
14 202317
15
Gender and firm-size: Evidence from Africa
201017
16 201317
17 202117
18 201516
19 200516
20 201815

About Mohammad Amin

Mohammad Amin is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Accounting, having authored 130 papers that have together received 982 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Taxation and Compliance Studies (31 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (20 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (19 papers), Global trade and economics (18 papers), Economic Growth and Development (15 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (15 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (14 papers) and Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (60 citations), Economics and Econometrics (510 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (139 citations), Gender Studies (153 citations) and Accounting (167 citations). Mohammad Amin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Asif Islam, Aaditya Mattoo, Cédric Okou, Jamal Ibrahim Haidar, Silvia Muzi, Simeon Djankov, Isis Gaddis, Domenico Viganola, Hulya Ulku and James H. Banks. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Development Studies, Journal of International Development, Review of Development Economics, Feminist Economics and Empirical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact