Mo Ray

52 papers receiving 537 citations

Peers

Mo Ray
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 56
  • Public Administration 70
  • General Health Professions 233
  • Pharmacy 18
  • Demography 53
Replace Sheldon D. Rose with:
Sheldon D. Rose United States
Dena Shenk United States
Angela L. Curl United States
Susan Tester United Kingdom
Marie Knox Australia
Chaya Schwartz Israel
Montserrat Celdrán Spain
Zev Harel United States
Linn J. Sandberg Sweden
Arie Rimmerman Israel
Mo Ray relative to Sheldon D. Rose United States Sheldon D. Rose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×58×
Sheldon D. Rose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mo Ray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mo Ray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mo Ray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mo Ray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mo Ray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mo Ray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mo Ray. The network helps show where Mo Ray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mo Ray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mo Ray Line = papers co-authored together Mo Ray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Community recreation and people with disabilities : strategies for inclusion
199764
2 201451
3 200749
4
Community recreation and persons with disabilities : strategies for integration
198846
5 201344
6 202037
7 201331
8
Hearing the voice of people with dementia
200226
9 202026
10 200925
11 201924
12 201722
13 200920
14 201718
15 202113
16 200611
17 202010
18 20169
19 20228
20 20166

About Mo Ray

Mo Ray is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Public Administration, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (28 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (8 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (56 citations), Public Administration (70 citations), General Health Professions (233 citations), Pharmacy (18 citations) and Demography (53 citations). Mo Ray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Stuart J. Schleien, Denise Tanner, Sally Richards, Alisoun J. Milne, Liz Lloyd, Judith E. Phillips, Mary Pat Sullivan, Marie Fox, Lizzie Ward and Judith Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Social Work, Ageing and Society, European Journal of Social Work, BMC Family Practice and Critical Social Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact