Mo Chi Yang

683 citations
39 papers · 504 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mo Chi Yang

37 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Mo Chi Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 181
  • Ophthalmology 81
  • Neurology 82
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 67
  • Rheumatology 36
Replace Dirk Reske with:
Dirk Reske Germany
Hee Bae Ahn South Korea
Antonio Martı́nez-Yélamos Spain
Angela Flores United States
Lyn Beck United Kingdom
Nancy Nealon United States
Altuğ Çetinkaya Türkiye
Jennifer C. Fulton United States
B Biedner Israel
Fatemeh Bazvand Iran
Mo Chi Yang relative to Dirk Reske Germany Dirk Reske's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Dirk Reske · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mo Chi Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mo Chi Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mo Chi Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mo Chi Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mo Chi Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mo Chi Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mo Chi Yang. The network helps show where Mo Chi Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mo Chi Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mo Chi Yang Line = papers co-authored together Mo Chi Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202045
2 201935
3 201833
4 202332
5 202230
6 201623
7 201923
8 201823
9 201723
10 201922
11 199719
12 202018
13 201617
14 201915
15 202013
16 202013
17 202213
18 202211
19 202010
20 20169

About Mo Chi Yang

Mo Chi Yang is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (18 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (3 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Inflammation biomarkers and pathways (2 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (181 citations), Ophthalmology (81 citations), Neurology (82 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (67 citations) and Rheumatology (36 citations). Mo Chi Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Quangang Xu, Huanfen Zhou, Shihui Wei, Mingming Sun, Shaoying Tan, Weihong Liu, Wei Chen, Wei Wang, Hongjuan Liu and Jost Bruno Jonas. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Ophthalmologica, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Medicine and Frontiers in Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact