M.N. Keene

675 citations
30 papers · 534 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

M.N. Keene

28 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers

M.N. Keene
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Condensed Matter Physics 475
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 205
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 213
  • Geophysics 48
  • Biomedical Engineering 71
Replace P. T. Beyersdorf with:
P. T. Beyersdorf United States
E. R. Yacoby Israel
E. Braun Germany
M. Ousséna United Kingdom
H. Burkhardt Germany
B. A. Aminov Germany
K. V. Mitsen Russia
B. Janossy France
H. L. Johnson Australia
Joseph Pankert Germany
M.N. Keene relative to P. T. Beyersdorf United States P. T. Beyersdorf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
P. T. Beyersdorf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.N. Keene

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.N. Keene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.N. Keene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.N. Keene more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.N. Keene

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.N. Keene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.N. Keene. The network helps show where M.N. Keene may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside M.N. Keene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.N. Keene Line = papers co-authored together M.N. Keene links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987178
2 198763
3 199252
4 199243
5 198931
6 199430
7 200521
8 199519
9 199613
10 199110
11 20059
12 19887
13 19906
14 19976
15 19906
16 19916
17 19936
18 19895
19 19925
20 19933

About M.N. Keene

M.N. Keene is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Molecular Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (26 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (9 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (7 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (5 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (475 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (205 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (213 citations), Geophysics (48 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (71 citations). M.N. Keene has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Chile and Japan. Frequent co-authors include C.E. Gough, N. G. Chew, R.G. Humphreys, C. M. Muirhead, J.S. Satchell, M. S. Colclough, Nikita Thomas, J.A. Edwards, S. Sutton and J.S. Abell. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Physica C Superconductivity, Applied Physics Letters, Superconductor Science and Technology and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact