M.L. Teague

979 citations
18 papers · 747 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

M.L. Teague

18 papers receiving 736 citations

Peers

M.L. Teague
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Materials Chemistry 615
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 341
  • Condensed Matter Physics 110
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 114
  • Biomedical Engineering 150
Replace Jinpeng Tian with:
Jinpeng Tian China
Weiyao Zhao Australia
Haicheng Lin China
Shangfei Wu China
Zhiming Wu China
Jewook Park South Korea
C. X. Shan China
Xingyuan Hou China
Haowen Ren United States
M.L. Teague relative to Jinpeng Tian China Jinpeng Tian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Jinpeng Tian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.L. Teague

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.L. Teague's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.L. Teague with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.L. Teague more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.L. Teague

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.L. Teague. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.L. Teague. The network helps show where M.L. Teague may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.L. Teague, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.L. Teague Line = papers co-authored together M.L. Teague links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2015147
2 2012140
3 2009113
4 202099
5 201952
6 201151
7 201145
8 201237
9 201720
10 201615
11 20089
12 20125
13 19643
14 20103
15 20083
16 20242
17 20112
18 20111

About M.L. Teague

M.L. Teague is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 747 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graphene research and applications (13 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (6 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (4 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (2 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (2 papers) and Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (615 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (341 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (110 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (114 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (150 citations). M.L. Teague has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include N.-C. Yeh, C.-C. Hsu, David A. Boyd, Marc Bockrath, Liang He, Faxian Xiu, André Beyer, Jairo Velasco, Chun Ning Lau and Cheng‐Shang Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Nano Letters, Solid State Communications, Nature Communications, Surface Science and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact