Mithu Chatterjee
Impact in
- Plant Science top 1%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Light effects on plants
- Berry genetics and cultivation research
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Genetics top 10%
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Papers in
-
- Light effects on plants 5
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 3
- Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects 2
- Berry genetics and cultivation research 1
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 1
- Co-authors
- David J. Hannapel (2 shared papers)Anjan Kumar Banerjee (2 shared papers)Wyatt Allen Miller (1 shared paper)Sang-Gon Suh (1 shared paper)Jitendra Paul Khurana (3 shared papers)Pooja Sharma (3 shared papers)Andrea Gallavotti (2 shared papers)Mary Galli (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Plant Cell (2 papers)PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (2 papers)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Nature Genetics (1 paper)Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Mithu Chatterjee
11 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Mithu Chatterjee's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Plant Science 1.5k
- Genetics 256
- Molecular Biology 444
- Horticulture 3
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 56
Countries citing papers authored by Mithu Chatterjee
This map shows the geographic impact of Mithu Chatterjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mithu Chatterjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mithu Chatterjee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mithu Chatterjee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mithu Chatterjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mithu Chatterjee. The network helps show where Mithu Chatterjee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mithu Chatterjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 995 |
| 2 | 2006 | 285 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 189 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 98 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 73 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 4 |
About Mithu Chatterjee
Mithu Chatterjee is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Light effects on plants (5 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (2 papers), Berry genetics and cultivation research (1 paper) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.5k citations), Genetics (256 citations), Molecular Biology (444 citations), Horticulture (3 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (56 citations). Mithu Chatterjee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include David J. Hannapel, Anjan Kumar Banerjee, Wyatt Allen Miller, Sang-Gon Suh, Jitendra Paul Khurana, Pooja Sharma, Andrea Gallavotti, Mary Galli, Tedd D. Elich and Punita Nagpal. Their work appears in journals such as The Plant Cell, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, PLoS ONE, Nature Genetics and Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.