Mitchell S. Tepper

19 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Mitchell S. Tepper
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Safety Research 247
  • Gender Studies 111
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 116
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 93
  • Health 45
Replace Linda R. Mona with:
Linda R. Mona United States
Ilana Duvdevany Israel
Susan Miller Smedema United States
Sharon Dale Stone Canada
Chaya Schwartz Israel
Laurie Powers United States
Yani Hamdani Canada
David Vandergoot United States
Shihning Chou United Kingdom
Marsha Saxton United States
Mitchell S. Tepper relative to Linda R. Mona United States Linda R. Mona's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Linda R. Mona · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell S. Tepper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell S. Tepper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell S. Tepper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell S. Tepper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell S. Tepper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell S. Tepper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell S. Tepper. The network helps show where Mitchell S. Tepper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell S. Tepper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell S. Tepper Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell S. Tepper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2000202
2 199950
3 199243
4 199741
5 199733
6 201730
7 201528
8 200125
9 199622
10
Lived experiences that impede or facilitate sexual pleasure and orgasm in people with spinal cord injury
200121
11 201210
12 199710
13 20205
14 20145
15
Moral and cultural foundations
20073
16 19973
17 19972
18 20162
19
State-of-the-art treatments and research
20071

About Mitchell S. Tepper

Mitchell S. Tepper is a scholar working on Safety Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disability Rights and Representation (7 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (6 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (247 citations), Gender Studies (111 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (116 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (93 citations) and Health (45 citations). Mitchell S. Tepper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Beverly Whipple, Barry R. Komisaruk, Tami S. Rowen, Marcalee Alexander, Frédérique Courtois, Stacy Elliott, David Satcher, Jesse Lieberman, Sigmund Hough and Lance L. Goetz. Their work appears in journals such as Sexuality and Disability, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, International Journal of Sexual Health and Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact