Mitchell Revill

651 citations
6 papers · 377 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • RNA modifications and cancer 2
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 1
    • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 1
    • Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling 1
    • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism 2

Mitchell Revill

6 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Mitchell Revill
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Cancer Research 118
  • Oncology 114
  • Molecular Biology 245
  • Biochemistry 19
  • Immunology 26
Replace Giuseppina Claps with:
Giuseppina Claps United States
James M. Arnold United States
Ana Herrero Spain
Olivier Masson Canada
Ilenia Agliarulo Italy
S. Telang United States
Gilles Rademaker Belgium
Johannes C. van der Mijn Netherlands
Mesquita Rodrigues Portugal
Mitchell Revill relative to Giuseppina Claps United States Giuseppina Claps's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Giuseppina Claps · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Revill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Revill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Revill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Revill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Revill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Revill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Revill. The network helps show where Mitchell Revill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Revill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Revill Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Revill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2017147
2 2017130
3 202050
4 201321
5 202118
6 201211

About Mitchell Revill

Mitchell Revill is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Oncology, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 6 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Lung Cancer Research Studies (1 paper), MRI in cancer diagnosis (1 paper), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (1 paper) and Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (118 citations), Oncology (114 citations), Molecular Biology (245 citations), Biochemistry (19 citations) and Immunology (26 citations). Mitchell Revill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Nicola J. Curtis, Susan E. Critchlow, Clare Murray, Haihong Zhong, Paul D. Smith, Armelle Logié, Lorraine Mooney, Mike Firth, Stéphanie Klein and Filippos Michopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, Oncotarget, Cancer Research and Science Translational Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact