Mitchell Litt

2.4k citations
92 papers · 2.0k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell Litt

85 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Mitchell Litt
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Otorhinolaryngology 98
  • Ophthalmology 148
  • Pharmaceutical Science 108
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 108
  • Reproductive Medicine 95
Replace Christopher M. Waters with:
Christopher M. Waters United States
Heiko Zimmermann Germany
Irving F. Miller United States
Massoud Motamedi United States
T K Hunt United States
Raphael C. Lee United States
Fang Wang China
F. LOWELL DUNN United States
Frank B. Johnson United States
R. Rox Anderson United States
Mitchell Litt relative to Christopher M. Waters United States Christopher M. Waters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.2×
Christopher M. Waters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Litt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Litt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Litt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Litt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Litt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Litt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Litt. The network helps show where Mitchell Litt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Litt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Litt Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Litt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992157
2 196886
3 199470
4 197770
5 197866
6 197666
7 196662
8 197660
9 197760
10 197259
11 196957
12 197055
13 199455
14 198053
15 197748
16 200047
17 197442
18 197740
19 198038
20
Rheology of biological systems
197337

About Mitchell Litt

Mitchell Litt is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Speech and Hearing, Cell Biology, Physiology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dysphagia Assessment and Management (11 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (10 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (9 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (8 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (6 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (6 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (6 papers) and Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (98 citations), Ophthalmology (148 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (108 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (108 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (95 citations). Mitchell Litt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Don P. Wolf, Mohammad A. Khan, Gershon Buchsbaum, Belinda Lee, Luis Blasco, Reuben E. Kron, G.S. Hansford, Der‐Tau Chin, Joseph E. Sokoloski and Sheldon K. Friedlander. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, AIChE Journal, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Otolaryngology and Chemical Engineering Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact