Mitchell E. Baum
Impact in
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 2%
- Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Soil Science top 10%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Crop Yield and Soil Fertility 11
- Bioenergy crop production and management 3
-
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 4
- Co-authors
- Sotirios V. Archontoulis (12 shared papers)Mark Allen Licht (4 shared papers)Isaiah Huber (3 shared papers)Michael J. Castellano (7 shared papers)John E. Sawyer (3 shared papers)Matthew Justin Helmers (3 shared papers)Emerson D. Nafziger (2 shared papers)Eileen J. Kladivko (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Field Crops Research (3 papers)Agronomy Journal (3 papers)Crop Science (2 papers)Soil Science Society of America Journal (1 paper)European Journal of Agronomy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIreland
In The Last Decade
Mitchell E. Baum
13 papers receiving 502 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Agronomy and Crop Science 291
- Soil Science 106
- Plant Science 312
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 142
- Environmental Chemistry 27
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell E. Baum
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell E. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell E. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell E. Baum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell E. Baum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell E. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell E. Baum. The network helps show where Mitchell E. Baum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell E. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 123 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 87 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 0 |
About Mitchell E. Baum
Mitchell E. Baum is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Soil Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 15 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (11 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (6 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (3 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (2 papers) and Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (291 citations), Soil Science (106 citations), Plant Science (312 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (142 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (27 citations). Mitchell E. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Sotirios V. Archontoulis, Mark Allen Licht, Isaiah Huber, Michael J. Castellano, John E. Sawyer, Matthew Justin Helmers, Emerson D. Nafziger, Eileen J. Kladivko, Heather Pasley and Virginia Nichols. Their work appears in journals such as Field Crops Research, Agronomy Journal, Crop Science, Soil Science Society of America Journal and European Journal of Agronomy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.